A state of mind is a legal place in conciseness with its own legal system.(A logical argument with examples.)

One may find it amazing or even might not believe when one hears this but there is a process of legitimacy for everything. Even a state of mind and thought. I am arguing logically that it is true and real.

A state of mind has its own legality and believe it or not its own justice system. The legalities are moderately fair as the consciousness of human beings is only moderately advanced. It may advance even more if the collective consciousness of human beings advances more. Again believe it or not, we, as a thinking consciousnesses have an opposite consciousness but is kept with a lid on by the justice system because we are the originals and its creators. It wont advance unless morally right. The opposite keeps us and prevents us from achieving a high state of ecstasy or happiness or even if we do, it has to have its share later on. As everything else there is a legalistic way of controlling and even maybe getting rid of it.

Since what we are talking about is a process of thought, it is very hard or even maybe impossible to observe physically but one can pick up the sign that it gives or shows.

To give an example of legalities in the process of thought, try to see someone who is in quarrel or is not at peace with him/her self. It would be evident that that person is caught in the legal system of thought and is very hard to get out of it unless in the legal way. Now as I have mentioned earlier it has its own way of functioning. Again to our amusement a state of mind has to have the legalities in order to be so. Narrowing it down and give a logical argument by examples, certain states of mind such as confidence, bravery and happiness also other thought of certain kind have their own legalities in order to exist. For example, try feeling confident more that you already are without any reason, or even be brave or happy more than you already are. The logical examples above and also many more are reasons for one to know that there is a legal system in the process of thought with its own judiciary system and legality of functioning.

Everything is, because it is the only correct and logical thing to be.

Starting from the universe and its beginning, all the things that reside in the universe, the way everything functions, the way everything is, when everything is, where everything is, how everything reacts, everything that exists and the way it exists and acts, is because it is the only correct and logical thing for it to be.

Lets take for example, the law of gravity. Smaller objects get attracted to the larger ones because of the dent that the larger ones create on the fabric of space time than the smaller ones and the smaller objects can't do otherwise than to go down the dent that the bigger objects created.

When we look at the example above, we can see that it is the only logical option that it had. Thus it was the only logical and correct thing for it to be like so.

It is only logical for a wall that is stronger than your push to push you back when you push it, it is only logical for it to tumble down if it is not strong enough. It is only logical for water to turn into ice when it is cold enough, and to turn into vapor when it is hot enough.

So believe it or not, the same goes to all things from beginning up till now and the future and things we don't understand yet. The answer to all of them is that it is the only logical thing to be.

Does God exist?(Logically speaking)

The question whether God exists or not is a very debatable one.There are a lot who may argue that God exists without any doubt. There are also many who may argue that there is no such thing as God or anything supernatural for that mater.

The logical question here is which idea is right and which idea is wrong or even if it matters at all.

Using logic here means, the use of evidence, reasoning and also it is logical to always leave a space of doubt and also according to the magnitude of the unknown factor.

Trying to apply logic in this question "Does that exist?" we first have to look at the evidences of both sides. There are evidences supporting each side of the argument on whether God exists or not.

Lets look at them

Logical evidences that support the argument that God exists :-

There are many logical evidences that support the argument that God exists. Here are some logical ones

1) Concept of creation that are mind boggling and even arguably impossible for humans ans science to understand

i) Life:-   Science being the highest and strongest rival to the argument that god exists has attempted to explain where and how life began to the limit of its understanding. But what science hasn't even got a glimpse on is what life is and what power makes life evolve exactly the way it should and how it knows how to evolve. Because evidentialy life knows how to evolve in order to increase its chances of its survival.

ii) Reality:- Science being the highest and strongest rival for the argument that God exists, it has tried and to a certain extent explained our universe and physical reality. But what science hasn't understood is basically the basic question"What is reality?" and how it came about. The most logical scientific explanation for the beginning of existence may be the theory "spontaneous creation". But it nor science have answered or even looked at the concept that vacuum is not a total nothingness if something has the potential to exist in it or if something can exist in it. Nothingness can not even be thought of because there is nothing to think of. If something can exist in nothing it is not nothing but a legitimate place for things to exist in. It is like a page of reality.

2) Science being the highest and strongest rival for the argument that exists does not deal with things that can not be manipulated with :- If it can not deal with things that can not be seen, touched or sensed by senses that we have or can generate, science doesn't deal with it.

3) Witnesses of miracles:- There are too many both today and in the old days that claim to have witnessed a miracle. There are actually too many and most of them tell their story genuinely.

4) Science being the highest and strongest rival for the argument that God exists its theory usually changes:- Theories of science usually change when there is a wider and bigger way of looking at things comes along. So those theories and scientific ideas that back the argument that God may not exist may change tomorrow if a wider scope theory comes along.

Logical evidences that support the argument that God doesn't exist

There are many logical points that one can raise in order to argue that there may not be such a thing as God. Here are some logical ones.

1) Scientific evidences:- Nowadays scientific theories have reviled answers to many mysteries that once, whose only explanation was God. Science has tried and has mostly been successful explaining the nature of things and how they came about, Some of the explanations as we may all know are against the idea of God.

Here are some of them

i) Theory of evolution:- In most religions, it is believed that God created everything and also life and humans as they are. But the theory of evolution, which is the most accepted theory in the scientific community, explains that life may have started a very long time ago when a chemical reaction took place when the atmosphere of the earth at that time which is very different from the one now, water and lightning came together as one and brewed life in the simplest form. Life then has been evolving to this stage through millions of years of evolution.

ii) The big bang theory and spontaneous creation:- Most religions believe that God created everything that exists. But science tries to tell a different story. The big bang theory is accepted by almost all of the scientific community and spontaneous creation is also widely accepted.

The big bang theory states that everything resulted from a big bang that occurred billions of years ago. This idea lacked something, it was, how the first agents that caused the big bang existed.

Spontaneous creation tries to explain that. Just as its name, Spontaneous creation explains that something can be created out of nothing or vacuum due to quantum fluctuation that occurs in a vacuum.

Not only these but there are many theories and evidences in science that are against the argument that God exists.

When we try to apply reasoning in this argument on whether God exists or not, one who is logical has to look at all sides without bias. One also has to put into consideration that there there maybe things that maybe above the reasoning and comprehending capacity of humans. Science is a very reasonable thing to believe in period. But in this case has many faults so one shouldn't blindly take its side in this argument for it would be foolish. One should also not ignore its evidences.