Country. Should there be contries or should the world just be one?

What is a country? It is a geographically defined territory, with people in it, that has one government that governs the people residing in that territory. The people are usually of the same or of an intermixed tribes with a history of intermarriage, cultural exchange, trade exchange, religious tolerance, similarity in ideology of life, similarity in cuisine, intermixed language, knowledge of each others background and history and the like. It can be said that it is the land, the people and the history married together that makes a country a country.

Although it is convincing in ideology it is something that can raise a lot of question philosophically on its legitimate existence. it is notoriously unstable meaning to say part of a land and people that was part of one country yesterday may break out on its own or join other country in the future. This kind of thing happens all the time and has happened constantly throughout history. It is also one of the major causes of war in the history of human kind. Held as sacred by the majority of human population, it is one of the most sensitive and chaos triggering  thing in the world.   

But should there be countries or should the world just be one? Even though it may seem impossible today, the probability that there will be one world rather than a world divided up into many different countries in the future is extremely high. In fact one may argue that that is the inescapable future of the world. If brought up to discussion, philosophically it is a very controversial issue weather we should have a geographical separation or not. In the world where we live today, many part of the population of the world is racially intermixed. Also philosophically it is very hard and almost impossible to get a solid unbreakable ideological backbone for the idea of a country as we know it today. There are some reasons for one to say that there should be countries and also other reasons for one to say that there shouldn't.

             Reasons why there should be countries and why there shouldn't be

Reasons for why there should be countries	Reasons for why there should only be one world
It creates difference and difference is good. With difference arises competition and colorfulness	There would be a lot less conflicts as a whole that arises when a country wants to keep its interest that is in contrast to others. This actually is a very big deal considering that we are living in a nuclear age and this should be given major points
Reservation of culture and traditions. One can progress and inbetter ones own culture which may lead to a very different direction from the other which is good because diversity is always good and there is power in diversity.	There would be equal opportunity for all human kind
If there is only one world the system may be imperfect and may not be suitable due to human errors and greed. So if that happens there would not be another alternative and hope whereas there would be if there are other different countries with different systems.	A system can be created so that every culture would be preserved and there still could be one world and also with the intermix of cultures another culture that is different would evolve.
Selected people get to keep their way of life with their own governance with the people of their kind.	Ideas would be enriched a lot more as ideas from around the world can come together as one.
There would be significantly less chaos created if discrimination and unfairness arises towards certain groups, race and religious entities.	Outlooks of many would broaden tremendously as they would be able to move around and see a world outside of their own enclosed one.
There would be a sense of ownership of the country by the citizens and initiation to keep and  develop the country.	The probability of a nuclear war would be significantly less and hence the probability of the annihilation of civilization or even human race.
It would be a lot harder for terrorists to move anywhere they want.	The intelligence and the quality of the human race would improve as it is scientifically proven that interbreeding produces genetically superior breed.

                                                                                                  By Alazar Desta

Power is the only thing that speaks!!

Lets face it if there is no power there is nothing! If you have no power you have nothing, If you have the power to do so you can have everything. Things get done by power. Power is the difference between can and can not. It doesn't matter which for it takes if you have power you can, and if you don't you cant. It's as simple as that. It's deceiving though because it has many forms. For example being able to influence people to make you a king is having the power to be a king or creating something that moves planet size objects when you want just by thinking about it is having the power to move planet size objects. Lets take money for example. What do you think money is?
Even the laws of nature(God's laws) are power. For example gravity is a pulling power, consciousness is a power to be aware etc. Every law of nature(God's law) is power because power makes things happen. Without power nothing would have happened. Power also prevents things from going astray from the law. If the laws had no power things would have vanished in thin air without any explanation but the power in the laws makes them constant. Face it law without power is not a law but a huge joke. 

                                                                                                                By Alazar Desta

Life is everything! But consistent!

We always hear people say different things about life. Life is a school! People might say. We also may have heard once or twice when people say that life is a game! Its a challenge! So on. They are absolutely right. Life is a school, its a challenge, its a game, its serious, its not so serious, its cruel, its forgiving, its bad, its good, its sad, its happy, its complicated, its simple, its nothing, its everything, its a dance, its still, its ever changing, its the same, and so on. But one thing is for sure that is that it is consistent!

                                                                                                                  By Alazar Desta              

Gravity applies in all things, even thought!!

Gravity as we know it is a law of physics. When smaller objects get closer to bigger objects the bigger objects attract the smaller objects because the dent that the bigger objects create on time space continuum is much steeper than that of the smaller ones. But this law also applies in thought. The more you get closer to certain thoughts the more they you get attracted to them. If you want to have certain thoughts or if you want to get rid of certain thoughts remember that the law of gravity works. Take baby steps and over time it really works. Say we all know the teaching of Ekhart Tolle of being in the now. If you find it hard to be in the now take baby steps and remember that the law of gravity works. The more you get closer the more it will attract you.

                                                                                                          By Alazar Desta

5 reasons that suggest there is an unseen administration in the universe

Administration:- The act or process of administering, especially the management of a government or large institution. (source:- the free dictionary)

Here in this blog it would imply administering or managing the universe and detailes.

It is normal for a questioning mind to ask whether what we see, prove and provide evidence for is all there is or whether there is something else. Especially whether something that governs all including us exists or not. This actually has been a debate for many centuries.

Well,

Here are some logical points that back the idea that there is an unseen admimistration in the universe.

1) Without administration everything would have been absolutely chaotic and void of any order
Well, that is not the case. There obviously should be an administrator b/c without admimistration, there would be chaos. Whatever it maybe there needs to be an inforcement and inforcer in order for things to have some kind of order.

2) Everything is bound to the laws of nature
If there is no inforcement or inforcer, nothing would be bound to anything. But as evident, nothing does go astray from the laws of nature.

3) The way evolution takes place:-
What I mean to say is, evolution somehow knows how to evolve.
Proof:-
    3.1. Everything we(lifeforms) have aquired through evolution has a purpose. eg hands to manuplate, nose for breathing, gills for breathing under water etc.
    3.2.  Everything evolves according the environment it is in
    3.3. Evolution makes a spicies adopt to the environment, exactly as the environment

4) Prey-Predator ratio(The food web ratio)


Nature somehow(obviously with legitimate cause) configured the prey predator ratio perfectly.eg. There is abundent vegitation, enough herbivourous that the vegitation would be enough for the consumption of the herbivores ratio wise, few carnivores so that there is enough herbivores for the consumption of carnivores ratio wise.

5) Relation between environment and the way spicies evolve:-
There seems to be a direct relation between environment and the way spicies evolve. There seems to be something that sees and feels the environmemt and lets spicies evolve according to it. eg:-
    5.1.  Animal camouflage
"The main objective of a camouflage animal when it assumes a “blending in” effect is to avoid being victimized by its predator or to increase its chances of victimizing its prey. Basically, camouflage is an important tool animals use for survival. This can be influenced by the animal’s environment, its physiology, its characteristics as a prey, or its behavior as a predator. source:- From this website 
   
    5.2. Amaizing features aquired by spicies:-      All spicies aquire amaizing features that is exactly best suited for the environment that they are in which would make them better survive in that particular environment.

9 Arguments against 'something out of nothing' theory of Quantum physics about the begining of the universe

1) 'Nothing' does not, has not and will not exist to think about to begin with.

2) The argument of 'something out of nothing' theory of how our universe began is that to begin with 'nothing' is unstable.

"Quantum mechanics tells us that there is no such thing as empty space. Even the most perfect vacuum is actually filled by a roiling cloud of particles and antiparticles, which flare into existence and almost instantaneously fade back into nothingness.These so-called virtual particles don't last long enough to be observed directly, but we know they exist by their effects. (Source:- BBC Earth)

2.1) If 'nothing' is nothing, it can't be unstable because unstable is a property. Something that doesn't exist can't have a property

2.3) Accirding to quantum physisits" Even the most perfect vacuum is actually filled by a roiling cloud of particles and antiparticles, which flare into existence and almost instantaneously fade back into nothingness.These so-called virtual particles don't last long enough to be observed directly, but we know they exist by their effects" (Source BBC Earth)

But,

2.3.1) Why is it filled with particles and anti particles? Because it is its property. But if it is nothing, it doesn't exist, if it doesn't exist, it has no property.

3) Nothing is not nothing if we can think of it.
Nothing is just..... We can't think or talk about it since it doesn't exist. It is not a place where anything whatsoever can reside in. Not even our thoughts. Since it doesn't exist, it is not permitted. So we can't think about it in whatsoever way.

3.1) Applying quantum physics to understand it wouldn't be permitted since it doesn't exist it doesn't allow thought in it.

4) nothing is not nothing if something can reside in it

Proof

4.1) Something can not reside in a place that does not exist.

because

4.1.1) Existance can not exist in non existance.

4.2) A legitimate existance with nothing in it is not nothing b/c it is a page of existance to begin with

5) 'Vacume' is not nothing

           because,

5.1) something can exist or reside in 'vacume'. It has a property. A property of a place where in which things can reside in.

Just as its name implies vacume is an empty space or place that can be filled with something. So it is a place and not nothing.

and

5.2) Even "clouds of particles and antiparticles" couldn't have resided in it if it wasn't a place that they could reside in or a place that permits such entities to reside in in the first place. If not a place, even theory can't reside in it. Meaning it would be impossible to think about in any way whatsoever.

6) As 'nothing' is non existant, nothing can come out of it nor can anything be created out of it nor in it.

Proof

6.1. For something to be created in it from it, there needs to be an "it" at first.

7) For something to exist, it needs a place to exist in. If 'nothing' is truely nothing it wouldn't have been 'a place' or a reality where things can exist in. It wouldn't have had the system to be a place that permits anything with any property whatsoever to exist.(Even quantum fluctuations)

So 'Vacume' would be a place as nothing can't reside anywhere that isn't a permissive place.

.
8) Something that does not exist can not have a cause or an effect

9) Laws of phisics can't exist in non existance. Nothing can exist in non existance.

So according to me our best bet on the question "what before existance?" would be, there is no such a thing.